[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multi-hex units

To: crimson-users@seul.org
Subject: Re: Multi-hex units
From: "Marcus Schreiner" <marcus.schreiner@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:27:15 +0200 (MEST)
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:27:31 -0400
References: <1098375428l.364l.0l@fizz>
Reply-to: crimson-users@seul.org
Sender: owner-crimson-users@seul.org

> I suspect that in the vast majority of cases it's not going to be an
> issue.
> I'd like to try without any special provisions first. The second hex
> simply
> follows the first and ends up where it ends up. I'm not sure that turning
> etc.
> is really necessary (and IIRC Battle Isle didn't allow it either). Simple
> is nice.

Okay, but then what do we net multi-hex units for? If you do not have
influence on the second hex field, it will be an obstacle in a battle.
So the big units will need a lot more firepower to balance this
disadvantage.
Perhaps the strike distance of the unit be calculated from both fields?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multi-hex units
  - From: Jens Granseuer <jensgr@gmx.net>

References:
- Re: Multi-hex units
  - From: Jens Granseuer <jensgr@gmx.net>

Prev by Author: Re: Multi-hex units
Next by Author: Re: Multi-hex units
Previous by thread: Re: Multi-hex units
Next by thread: Re: Multi-hex units
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread