[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [f-cpu] another DATE report

On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:02:10PM +0100, Christophe wrote:
> Well, it's true i'm shy in english :-)
> More seriously, I think the issue about the time penality about using CAS and
> CAS2 is overstated. The solution offered by Yann to replace it with a fix array
> of semaphores through the SR mechanisms is an evidence that either he don't
> know about what we are really talking or he misunderstands the real purposes of
> CAS2. Yann, let me tell you that your solution is really clumsy (I will explain
> why). Personnaly, I think that you are too more confident about yourself -
> especially since you states everytime that you are the only one who code.

Wrong. But I haven't seen much VDHL from anybody except Yann, either.

Ok, let's forget that for the moment. In order to get the big picture
and be able to have an opinion of my own: what the heck *is* CAS/CAS2?
I suppose it's not the Column Address Strobe signal found in DRAMS...

URLs welcome.

 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/