Re: gEDA-user: 4-bit_12-LED.png (PNG Image, 1024x768 pixels)

[ldoolitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Svenn -

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:32:31PM +0200, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
> A solder dot does _explicitely_ tell the reader that there is a
> connection. The lack of a solder dot does not explicitely tell you
> [chop]

If you want to tell people that they should use wire jumps in
their schematics, you have already lost.

If you want gschem to have the capability of showing unconnected
wire crosses with jumps, so you can display schematics that way,
you have a chance.  Especially if you volunteer to help code.

> I think there must be some kind of misconseption of the use
> of the words explicite and implicite in my original post.

The correct English spellings are explicit and implicit.

   - Larry


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user