[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Bug in gnetlist?

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Bug in gnetlist?
From: Krzysztof KoÅciuszkiewicz <k.kosciuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:46:21 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:46:52 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m4fJnKinWyopogDUou97612F6TrlfEVfBfzhdq1i/PY=; b=eA4RXn85WC2bVQvDK0WL9yNf48aG1mRn2jg3v1XHOSGWK1n3IC8i9uJtVWvB7Ba4me kKbuX35WAP/7BzuTJ18MSZw4dZ8xFS2ZOhRhP8dXnmK7v6Nq1O5Ph4t23dYGhTojmVB5 U9+A/mSWVUFU1YVXpxkc7KqX+mhxyCejGGHfI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IbFBAFtgsuUuW9N6exF9hvqJ8mNPIwN8WcbTPBJz4JLecSuR2/5vTb0ZT8BIa5HRd+ I/qVWzu1s2xHOTRH3eheTAOAptS67n7bXazE2RqW8aPxNPowZ2wSbFAYT11aatz90Emq r+XXlOnW/j92Zp2KEKxsB5Z+e8H0VN/AVMv18=
In-reply-to: <BANLkTik_6VO6=iZtXawX4TTMS5xo_QEogg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BANLkTik_6VO6=iZtXawX4TTMS5xo_QEogg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

2011/4/5 Abhijit Kshirsagar <abhijit86k@xxxxxxxxx>:

> Â I have multi-page schematics with a number of off-page connectors
> Â (realised using the symbols input-1.sym and input-2.sym) as described
> Â in the howto:
> Â [1]http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:na_howto#what_is_the_net_attribut
> Â e_used_for
> Â I noticed that if multiple net attributes happen to be present on the
> Â same net in the schematic, then the netlist seems to treat them as
> Â completely different nets and /ignores/ any interconnections.

I suspect your case is covered by one of the bugs below:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/698395
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/698524
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/698570

Two of them were recently fixed in the git HEAD, so you can try to use
development version of gnetlist to check.
The remaining bug is harder to fix.
-- 
Krzysztof KoÅciuszkiewicz
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" -- Leonardo da Vinci


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Bug in gnetlist?
  - From: Abhijit Kshirsagar

References:
- gEDA-user: Bug in gnetlist?
  - From: Abhijit Kshirsagar

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Power users us normal users, a conflict? [WAS: Re: zview/ngscope]
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Attribute Net (without pin assignment) - for Powerand Port Symbols
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: Bug in gnetlist?
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Bug in gnetlist?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread