[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
Felipe De la Puente Christen wrote:
> Why not using IDES/STEP file format.
Because STEP is a hell of a standard and non-free, too. It encompasses much
more than 3D mechanical data and aims to cover every aspect of every
product. The standard itself is closed source. You have to pay real money
and sign a NDA document to receive a copy.
I once tried figure, how a cube as a 3D equivalent to "hello-world" would
look like in STEP format. There was lots and lots information available _on_
STEP but none on the actual syntax.
Going the freecad way would avoid this kind of hassle.
> According to my Aerspace related partners, DXF has almost nothing to
> apport to 3D CAD.
true.
---<)kaimrtin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
- References:
- gEDA-user: help with compiling gedagaf-1.6.1, gcc4.4.2, gtk-2.18.9
- Re: gEDA-user: help with compiling gedagaf-1.6.1, gcc4.4.2, gtk-2.18.9
- gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- Re: gEDA-user: Commercial CAD, land pattern generators report
- From: Felipe De la Puente Christen