Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Aug 13, 2010, at 5:39 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
>> So why not just have properties, and sets of properties.
> 
> A set of properties *is* a class, if you apply the same set of
> properties to many nets.  Why not let the user pre-define such
> classes, to make their work easier?

I suggested that.

I also suggested considering a set of properties to be a property, not a class. Or did you not understand "flattened union". Maybe that was too obscure.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user