Re: gEDA-user: blue sky ideas - written down finally

[DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> My current methodology would have an infrastructure bubble on some
> back sheet that connects up the power and ground pins for each
> package.  But now since package selection can be deferred, that
> doesn't work so hot, unless we extend the idea of back-annotation to
> include creation of schematic sheets.  Which I'm OK with.

This whole scheme just screams for back-annotation, especially since
you really want pcb to be able to do pin and gate swapping.

> Actually.... this is starting to sound like embedding a gattrib grid
> on a sheet some place.

Can gattrib map pins to nets already?


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user