Re: gEDA-user: Random thoughts on the future interface of PCB

[kai-martin knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Clifton wrote:

> Not a bad thing IMO.. and the toporouter not only looks like it
> will be able to do excellent routing, its quality output will
> attract users to the software. That in turn helps attract
> development effort (or funding for it).

Sure, a fully functional topo router would be a great step forward.
It would make geda/pcb stand out from the competition. 

However, if the goal is to attract users, there is a more powerful
means: An installer of native windows versions that works with no
caveats.

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user