On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:27:47 -0500 DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We could probably get around most of these problems by switching from > round-end flashes to square-end flashes, as long as we use a + > orientation instead of a x orientation. That way the ends of the > fingers won't have to extend much beyond the edge of the relief flash. > Or we could use diamond shaped flashes for x orientations. It would be nice if the software tried all the possibilities according to the current situation at each thermal case out of a *, but max up to + or X. For example sometimes only one line can added, since others would commit short circuit. And a question. What do you guys are using when a SMD pad has to be connected to a POLY? I usually draw lines, but it looks nasty. Levente __ Email: levente.kovacs@xxxxxxx Phone: +41227672276 Fax: +41227678200 Home Page: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs Public key: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs/CERN/public_key ________________________________________ /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X against HTML email & vCards / \ http://arc.pasp.de/ Have Fun, & Linux! 73 for all by HA5OGL. This message was generated by Sylpheed.
Attachment:
pgpySkdR6m8Xd.pgp
Description: PGP signature