Re: gEDA-user: What is the logic in gnetlist/spice-sdb when to add a 'X' prefix to an identifier?

[Christoph Lechner <cl0023@xxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

al davis wrote:
> On Sunday 08 February 2009, Christoph Lechner wrote:
>> Some of the diodes in the circuit are modelled by a SUBCKT,
>> so I have to manually add a X prefix to these diode
>> identifiers in the SPICE netlist (for example D101 => XD101)
>> for the SPICE simulation to work. Because I hate this
>> somewhat:
>> How do I get spice-sdb to add the 'X' prefix automatically
>> like it does for example for ICs? I'm using the file and
>> model-name attributes to say what model to use.
> 
> How can it know?
Well, I thought: maybe there's some attribute dedicated to this case ...
> 
> I recommend that you add the X on the schematic.  Doesn't the 
> netlister just pass the label through?
Not really. If I call the diode XD108, the netlister calls it DXD108.

Wouldn't it be a work-around to call the diode U108? I'll try that.

- - cl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJjx1HWo2QgtqY4K8RAsJQAJ4mKA1aJXP6uPmj9B8pdZTXlNiYqQCff8Ae
JPQM1VTEpuK4pkKiv4kWxxs=
=qHAX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user