Re: gEDA-user: What is the logic in gnetlist/spice-sdb when to add a 'X' prefix to an identifier?

[Christoph Lechner <cl0023@xxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stuart Brorson wrote:
>>> I recommend that you add the X on the schematic.  Doesn't the
>>> netlister just pass the label through?
>> Not really. If I call the diode XD108, the netlister calls it DXD108.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be a work-around to call the diode U108?
> 
> I doubt that will work.
You're right. It didn't work :(

> 2. Change the DEVICE attribute of your diode to something other than
> DIODE.  I forget what the desired attribute value should be, but it
> probably doesn't matter if you just give the symbol an X refdes.
That's what I did now. I set the DEVICE attribute to BZX84C18, the name
of the part. The refdes was changed to UD108, so the spice-sdb netlister
now calls the part XUD108.
That's OK for me, although this designator is a little bit ugly.

- - cl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJjzG1Wo2QgtqY4K8RAgpRAJ4oMh0v8j6EnGZYHkFAoI3wgvlGngCfe36Q
GJfn56dJhT7miOyLrJjRSgQ=
=esEE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user