On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:45 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > In-tree "plugins" is a +1 from me, as I hate to think of the level of > > breakage we could cause if we do more drastic re-factoring of PCB. > > I was thinking, pcb probably will end up needing a command line option > to print the right compiler options to build plugins with... > especially with the option to use C or C++ now. They call that "pkgconfig" in the Gnome-ish world, although it isn't Gnome specific. libgeda uses it. It is aimed at libraries, but I think it could be made to do what we want. You could add it to PCB I guess - we could even teach PCB how to invoke the compiler and build plugins if we were feeling over-keen! (But perhaps that is encroaching on being too clever). -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user