[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Soft and Hard symbols
On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:08 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> But gEDA isn't a tool: it's a toolkit.
>
> I consider gEDA to be a tool. gschem, gattrib, gnetlist - all tools.
gschem, gattrib, gnetlist are tools. gEDA is a toolkit.
> Thier job is to help engineers automate the design process, to do
> that, they have to know a lot about electronics design.
Collectively, yes. Separately, no tool needs to know more than its specialty. That's modular, factored design.
>
>> The less a tool knows about . . .
>
> You just said it wasn't a tool.
The toolkit is composed of tools. The tools are specialists, the kit isn't so much.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user