Re: gEDA-user: [Fwd: Re: Separate Vcc voltages]

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe unreleased but not unavailable. Plus the ideas are always open for
use. 

One idea that I have been rolling around in my brain is to drop the c
code for reading and writting the schematic files and replace it with a
scripted front end. The idea being that since there are differences
between my file structures and geda that a scripted front end and back
end would allow easy porting between the two. Plus importing from other
sorces projects might become feasable.

Steve Meier

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:14 -0600, John Doty wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 8:07 AM, Jonatan Åkerlind wrote:
> 
> > On fre, 2007-07-13 at 06:10 -0700, Steve Meier wrote:
> >> Jonatan,
> >>
> >> You missed my point. One pin from the net is vissible. The other net
> >> pins are hidden thus reducing symbol bloat.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry if I was unclear, actually got that point and agreed with you  
> > that
> > this is a good way of doing it. However, can the internal net name be
> > Vdd or Vcc? Does the external connection override the internal net  
> > name?
> 
> Remember that Steve is teasing us with features from his unreleased  
> private version. The released gEDA doesn't work that way.
> 
> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user