Re: gEDA-user: [Fwd: Re: Separate Vcc voltages]

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree. It goes with DJ's idea to have bus pins have multiple pin
numbers as well.

Steve Meier

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:58 -0600, John Doty wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Jonatan Åkerlind wrote:
> 
> > On fre, 2007-07-13 at 09:14 -0600, John Doty wrote:
> >>> Sorry if I was unclear, actually got that point and agreed with you
> >>> that
> >>> this is a good way of doing it. However, can the internal net  
> >>> name be
> >>> Vdd or Vcc? Does the external connection override the internal net
> >>> name?
> >>
> >> Remember that Steve is teasing us with features from his unreleased
> >> private version. The released gEDA doesn't work that way.
> >
> > That was what I thought. So the internal net name should be something
> > that is very unlikely to appear in the final schematic then, which is
> > kind of hard to guarantee. Perhaps gEDA should work that way aftar  
> > all?
> 
> Might be safer and easier to understand if you could simply have more  
> than one pinnumber= attribute on a pin, and get them all netlisted.  
> You can put the extra attributes on now, but gnetlist just uses the  
> first one it sees.
> 
> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user