Re: gEDA-user: More robust support of multi-part symbols.

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 14:33 -0700, Joerg wrote:
>
>>
>> That makes hardcore analog stuff very hard to understand.
>
> But you can do it with current gEDA: Put the functional symbol and the
> corresponding power symbol close together. The same refdes indicate  
> that
> they belong together. There is not really a need that the power  
> pins are
> attached to the functional (slot) symbol.


Guys, the important thing is that gEDA allows you to do it the way  
that makes sense for your application in your environment. It doesn't  
get in the way of doing it the way you need. Of course, that also  
means that you need to push it in one direction or another: some find  
that annoying. But to me, it's very, very nice that it does not push  
me away from whatever approach the project needs. They don't all need  
the same one...

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user