Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.

[Peter Clifton <pcjc2@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 16:47 +0200, Armin Faltl wrote:

> - diff(1) has options to ignore whitespace changes and blank lines.
> -> why not use/produce a version of patch(1) that ignores such changes,
> e.g. by internally reformating to a standardized indentation and spacing?
> I'm not sure whether the -l option of patch handles string constants as 
> such.

It is git / stgit which throw up the conflicts, but as you suggest - I'm
sure there is _some_ option to allow flexibility with these things. It
might involve writing a filter script like Robert did with the Boolean
-> bool changes.

Best regards,

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user