[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Another autorouter bug

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Another autorouter bug
From: Dan McMahill <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:28:51 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:40:34 -0500
In-reply-to: <200603081835.k28IZtpK012097@envy.delorie.com>
References: <200603081331.08467.vanessadannenberg@gmail.com> <200603081835.k28IZtpK012097@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050412

DJ Delorie wrote:

If the board has an 'outline' or 'route' layer, the autorouter should avoid placing 'traces' on this layer.
Yeah, the autorouter doesn't know about the outline.
Nor does it have a generic "keep out" layer.

after the HID conversion, keepouts are high on my hit list. Reminds me... I should check in my document I plan to work from.

-dan

References:
- gEDA-user: Another autorouter bug
  - From: Vanessa Dannenberg
- Re: gEDA-user: Another autorouter bug
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Stale rat's nest?
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Soldering fine pitch chips
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Another autorouter bug
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Another autorouter bug
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread