Re: gEDA-user: General Layers questions

[John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 18, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Martin Kupec wrote:

> Generaly you are proposing that there should be a special type of
> footpring called 'via' and it should receive extra care.

Why single out "via" and "footprint" when they are merely members of an open-ended list of possible composite objects?

> 
> I am ok with that, I just need to figure out how to handle mapping from
> footprint layers to layout layers. I don't want concept of 'top',
> 'inner', 'bottom' layer at all...that is too naive for me.

A general mechanism for describing composite objects is needed.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user