Re: gEDA-user: OT: Bike Alarms

["David C. Kerber" <dkerber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David SMITH
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:32 AM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: OT: Bike Alarms
> 
> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 20:09 -0500, John Griessen wrote:
> > Lojack gets results for cars.  There's bound to be some way to do 
> > something that fits in with what happens with bikes.  Why 
> give up so easy?
> 
> It's easier to fit to cars because there are more places to 
> hide a box like this, and the car has a permanent power 
> supply available so the user doesn't have to take the unit 
> out for recharging.

...

> > A thief would not get results taking headsets off bikes he 
> wanted to take...
> > so it's not a dead end.
> 
> Also a bit of a PITA for the user having to take off the 
> headset frequently for recharging.

That's why I suggested the seat tube; the adjustments aren't as finicky as the head tube is.

D


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user