[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

Kai-Martin Knaak <knaak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Stephan Boettcher wrote:
>> The way to promote gedasymbols and to fix the default library is to
>> remove the default library, except for a small set of very generic
>> symbols.
> ack. 
> This set of symbols should provide the ability to start working as is
> and generally be examples for complete working symbols. That is, they
> should contain footprint attributes. And when applicable simulation
> attributes, too. HOWTOs and manuals may refer to these items.

nack.  There is no way for a footprint attribute to be generic.  

These symbols shall exactly not be examples, and exactly not just work.

They shall be symbols that can be use as they are for any workflow, by
adding the required attributes after instantiation, or by editing a copy
in a project lib, i.e., the first easy steps in learning symbol editing.


geda-user mailing list