Re: gEDA-user: Simulation troubles ...

[Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:03:01 -0500, al davis wrote:

> It has lots of features for advanced use, but doesn't work well as a
> simple waveform viewer. 

Did you use xmgrace ability to receive commands and actions via pipes?


> For that, I still think gwave is the best so
> far.  Gwave is simple, but has some build issues.

Well, the features Dan asked for (arbitrary functions, polar chart, smith 
chart, Millions of data points, etc), are clearly advanced. These would 
be a serious project to code from scratch. Don't underestimate the value 
of publication quality postscript output. 

---<(kaimartin)>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak                                  tel: +49-511-762-2895
Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik      fax: +49-511-762-2211	
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover           http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
GPG key:    http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user