[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: AMD64 & Geda
It seems that
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sci-electronics/tclspice-0.2.15"
have been masked.
tclspice is broken and that is why Geda is masked under amd64 on gentoo
Marc :)
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 01:31 -0400, Dan McMahill wrote:
> I'm not sure what the whole 'masked' thing means (I'm not a linux user),
> but I've used gEDA for years on a 64-bit system (alpha) with no problems
> so I'd be suprised if it didn't work correctly on AMD64. I know for a
> fact it at least builds on AMD64 running NetBSD, but I don't have one to
> try running it on.
>
> You may have issues with some of the dependencies. I know that us alpha
> users have had to fix countless bugs in 3rd party software. gEDA should
> be fairly 64-bit clean though.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> Marc wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I was wondering if the Geda suit is gonna be ported for AMD64, I know
> > its in the Gentoo portage but its masked off as unstable buggy or
> > something.
> >
> > this is what i get
> >
> > BusyBox64 ~ # emerge geda
> > Calculating dependencies
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "geda" have been masked.
> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> > request:
> > - sci-electronics/geda-20041228 (masked by: missing keyword)
> > - sci-electronics/geda-20040111-r1 (masked by: missing keyword)
> > - sci-electronics/geda-20050313 (masked by: missing keyword)
> >
> > For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page
> > or
> > refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> >
> > BusyBox64 ~ #
> >
> >
> > its been like this for months
> >
> > Marc :(
> >
> >
>
--
Marc <mark.price13@xxxxxxxxxxxx>