[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
From: sdb@xxxxxxxxxx (Stuart Brorson)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:34:11 -0400
In-reply-to: <4333227B.9050706@l-mx.de> from "C. Lechner" at Sep 22, 2005 11:30:35 PM
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> So what are your ideas about this??? Is it possible to remove
> the "net=GND:2" line from the sym files of the whole LM78xx
> family?

I am one of the folks who thinks that component symbols should not
have hidden pin connections.  Indeed, this problem is really acute
when the symbols live in a library, since newbies won't know that the
pin is connected to GND unless they open up the symbol and look at the
attributes.

Stuart

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
  - From: C. Lechner
- Re: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
  - From: C. Lechner

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Installing gEDA from 20050820 Suite CD on Fedora FC4
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Linear voltregs: Symbol bugs or features?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread