[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: PCB format wishlist
I like the idea of using geometric shapes at the lowest level, but
for
most PCBs this is *way* too low-level to be efficient. We need some
way of arbitrarily grouping shapes, grouping groups, etc, and
creating
some sort of macro/library/callout for those groups, so that we
don't
end up (for example) redefining a pad stack for every one of
hundreds
of pins.
Several times now in this thread I keep thinking that the language
Forth is being described. 'Words' built up on previously defined
'words'...
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user