[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: why some skip KiCAD and gEDA
On 09/08/2011 03:24 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
The good part of kicad was, that producing
a PCB is easily possible even if you know nothing about the tool.
But getting
to more advanced features was hard to impossible within the time i
tried it.
Now comes the catch: When i was a teenager, i did an electronics
project
in high school. Not having access to the internet and not knowing
anything
about OSS (i dont think gEDA existed back then), i got a copy of
Orcad for
DOS (it was ancient even back then). But, within a day i was able to
enter
my first test schematics and produce something that looked like a
PCB
yes, OrCad was a very powerful eda tool and to a certain extent quite
intuitive. I used this for many years back then.
.
.
.
Now the question is, why isn't there any OSS EDA tool out there that
combines the availability of complex features with ease of use like
Orcad did 20 years ago?
I truly believe that you have to take the strict viewpoint of the
hardware designers who will be the majority of users -- and not sit
back as a programmer --- when it comes to laying out a reasonable User
Interface for an EDA Tool. The OrCad tool was a prime example of this.
If there were one, i'd be happy to throw money at it, to help it
being
developed.
Attila Kinali
I also agree. I would be willing to do the same. I noticed somewhere on
the geda website that some arrangement has been made already with
Linuxfund.org to help toward this cause. I only see a mention of the
PCB tool - and no mention of gSchem or others. I wonder if someone can
clarify this here.
I think this is one more reason to compile a concise list of features
contained in this tool suite as an overview to help new or returning
users to see the importance of this project.
=Dan
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user