[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gooeys
>In Indy you don't have to tinker. Just uninstall KDE (rpm -e kdebase)
>and when you restart X (no need to logout) you will be dropped into
Does this mean you can't switch from KDE to another wm, like you can in a
default RH install?
>classic X. Of course because the default windows manager is fvwm2
>with Win95 look and feel you will find this is still more windowish
>than KDE. I will probably make a quick hack for making Windowmaker
>with the Night theme the default. But perhaps this is not a good
>idea: FVWM2 with Win95 looks will be more familiar to the user than
>Windowmaker. But Windowmaker is so nice...
I for one would vote for Windowmaker being the default non-KDE manager.
>I also think it is silly to be different from Windows just for the
>sake of it like the people of UBE are doing. For one part the user
>interface of Windows is not so bad. And second: you don't win by
>refusing to copy enemy's good points.
Both very good points.
I now find myself in the semi-uncomfortable position of having to
re-evaluate my stance. :)
I don't like the Windows interface. This is grounded in experience and is
not all 'adopted attitude'. KDE reminds me of Windows. A few hours of KDE
is not very much experience. A dislike of KDE then could be called
'migrated attitude'.
I'm lead to another question which you touched upon earlier. Why so much
focus on easy installations and easy interfaces? I mean, lets just say I
find the perfect desktop. It's easy on the eyes. A pleasure to navigate.
Endlessly conforming itself to my passing needs. Now what?
Gotta think 'bout this now. :)
-matt
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gooeys
- From: jfm2@club-internet.fr
- Re: gooeys
- From: Donovan Rebbechi <elflord@pegasus.rutgers.edu>