[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Paid performance-tor option?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Paid performance-tor option?
- From: Arrakis <arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:56:10 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:56:32 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+07hdGkY0Kit+/xNBenCavdtU9wLJ++FO82wY1eMv2I=; b=szAsVrnU19BhXcdfUcnBw9OJU7EsEsv4+6XvFraBnq1c0q8mX/a3CSZSh0erUYsHnj Ns8SZ47xdfs8qXtEkjVIp02wQAxdRqLBd2YRhdKBM/a15O18XBlAJ/1d+22q8xcD4XV4 m7XgnsLLV09y6jf9bvYVYUDOuIfBZ79B2s/MI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=SCDjMCWZKwf0apGRkPaJqx8SJm5mPx7Zqtjb+xTwjCisxMnWBJsneHKSJfWUvTsvUs dN1uuEKLZH/Ow0HeZ72rFs7skPyVM85GyddNK6t3/8JfvK/BggKgp7nxJxp6cne8aESg 7squcRKqQ16czy1KFCC068dtggecyOFu8ryX0=
- In-reply-to: <26856-45917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <48A9932D.3060704@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48A9A2E3.7020106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <26856-45917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
You may care to take a look at this, specifically the
5th, 7th, 8th, and 9th columns. Not all countries are
equal, especially when those countries to data
interception and data retention themselves.
http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559597
mplsfox02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> macintoshzoom:
>
>> Sorry, just re-reading my post, I am partially wrong, JONDONYM
>> (formerly JAP) is still running its main nodes from "compromised"
>> countries.
>
> There are no "compromised" or "safe" countries as there is no hostile or
> friendly network. Any concepts based on such assumptions are doomed.
>
>