Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

["Randolph D." <rdohm321@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi antispam
you are an activist for 120 % right?, the mailinglist is not only populated
with developers, but as well with people like you propagating the
apocalypse. We should be on the same direction. I guess you are not a
developer?
Andrew Lewman asked in the developer team what to do and sent a page to
make clear to differ. The project overtook the sentence, not only one time,
but twice, as well on the top. the backgroundcolour of the template has
been changed as well and currently no Qt browser with tor has been
released. Users already use tor with any kind of browser.You are
overreacting. Really, 30 % of the brosers are webkit, and Tor is not
working for them in your sense. Dont send your frust to a small project,
trying to develop. First let present then let the dogs falling over them.
not the other way round, that shows me that you are young and
unexperienced. Of course it is a big disappointment, that the webkit team
is not addressing the DNS proxy bug for TOR.  But try to see the developers
and delevelpment as your friend, e.g. the interface chat plugin for the Qt
browser offers encrypted severless chat. test ist and come back to the
project to promote it.
You are radical, please learn to improve without stubbing the baby with the
water out of the ton.
Regards

2012/8/16 <antispam06@xxxxxxx>

> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 03:21, A. Megas wrote:
> > As for leaking IP information, we work with a framework (Qt) that has
> > issues and limitations. Every release of Dooble includes detailed
> > information covering all of the fixes and improvements.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> So the package is unfit. As most people who risk their lives by using
> Tor are not English native speakers all these warnings should be written
> in big red letters above all the junk about how nicely it can encrypt
> the cache. This debate sounds like the wonderful Hide My Ass service. It
> was never written âwe do keep logs that we are going to give to the
> first to askâ. They wrote anonymity on all pages. They never pushed the
> service as a way to skip the filters on Hulu. If they would say that HMA
> would be a honest service. But, as this Dooble bundle, it's a scam.
> Worse, it can be a corporate paid honeypot. On one hand Vodafone
> voluntarily blocked Internet trafic in Egypt at the same time pushing
> mails in at least 3 countries to their employees that the totalitarian
> Mubarak regime forced them to do it. Talking again and again about a
> beta webkit, about how there is a bug report and so on stinks like a
> Vodafone type of move and not a couple of guys having a hard time
> understanding what's the issue.
>
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk