[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
On 7/31/15, Cari Machet <carimachet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> dear roger that is your opinion
Roger D:
> ... please think through whether it contributes usefully to the topic at
> hand, and whether it contributes *sufficiently* for many thousands of
> people to read it.
Roger asked us to think, before we type. He was courteous in my book.
And he is generally entirely conservative/ restrained-in-a-good-way on
such matters too.
Hard to ask for more than that.
Zenaan
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
- References:
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- From: Alexandre Guillioud
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- From: Alexandre Guillioud
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- From: Alexandre Guillioud
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
- Re: [tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military