[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
From: H D Moore <torspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:34:37 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:34:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <1bd71ad80703261218g506e3206q47427f54cc4b25cf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1174643070.5169.1180981693@webmail.messagingengine.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251949500.5466@pants.snark.net> <1bd71ad80703261218g506e3206q47427f54cc4b25cf@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.3

<spam>
My employer's product has RFC1314 support for sending exploit traffic ;-) 
http://www.bpointsys.com
</spam>

-HD

On Monday 26 March 2007 14:18, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> I worry about the day that someone actually does follow that RFC,
> wreck havok, and then in court use the defense, "I am following all
> the official standards of the communications network, and if there is
> a problem, it is with the other users who do not observe the
> standards".

References:
- Ultimate solution
  - From: JT
- Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
  - From: Matt Ghali
- Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
  - From: Michael_google gmail_Gersten

Prev by Author: Re: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
Next by Author: Re: Please don't recommend Tor Button!
Previous by thread: Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
Next by thread: Re: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread