[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
From: "Michael_google gmail_Gersten" <keybounce@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:18:52 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:19:02 -0400
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rmpR6OmL0O/fjy7/1s+sddxgWPbwmoGWE+tNCSkDX68X/BltlCQnrNOI41pOa+5NkQPoj0S9E1J/s18bXbB1ox0gNLjTgRTVnK61y2EkYcmhTXDMcXvRXq1dz3somVv7aIqhpy9z8Pi+k9UtV8RM+Z5ThIjZosExZF1aL1askYU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PTf4wY2lvMriyWJ+UXDCHmhR52UEWPfDi9bTuxj5+Km3+5WY11ndpwx/GtgfwyGN8sSSIlTkgQlTxELZsGG3NjjZN0DMA0KvWH+tT0qRo1a9AMJmZd3UjLU4O0pdarU4vC9FVGDQvMSCo4uf+5bNpQf4sDMzBGP7mbUioTbdDzc=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251949500.5466@pants.snark.net>
References: <1174643070.5169.1180981693@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1174654239.29188.1181002825@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1584352915.20070325095720@gmail.com> <deb31e820703250803i7a7cee29k1d17834de3c462d1@mail.gmail.com> <52836a540703250826j3e0bcf56pa616f628d58ed56d@mail.gmail.com> <20070325155057.GB12316@totoro.wangafu.net> <543857232.20070325115640@gmail.com> <20070325210639.61baef69@localhost> <876925264.20070325152032@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703251949500.5466@pants.snark.net>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 3/25/07, Matt Ghali <matt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Perhaps what you are looking for is full support for RFC 3514.


Was that the "evil bit" RFC?

I worry about the day that someone actually does follow that RFC,
wreck havok, and then in court use the defense, "I am following all
the official standards of the communications network, and if there is
a problem, it is with the other users who do not observe the
standards".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
  - From: H D Moore

References:
- Ultimate solution
  - From: JT
- Re: Ultimate solution
  - From: JT
- Re[2]: Ultimate solution
  - From: Arrakis
- Re: Re[2]: Ultimate solution
  - From: Koh Choon Lin
- Re: Re[2]: Ultimate solution
  - From: Kasimir Gabert
- Re: Re[2]: Ultimate solution
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re[4]: Ultimate solution
  - From: Arrakis
- Re: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
  - From: Fabian Keil
- Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
  - From: Arrakis
- Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
  - From: Matt Ghali

Prev by Author: Re: Ultimate solution
Next by Author: Re: Ultimate solution
Previous by thread: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: Free Software and Torpark (was: Ultimate solution)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread