Re: [tor-talk] Tor's reputation problem with pedo, some easy steps the community could take

[Low-Key² <cryptic303@xxxxxxxxx>]

Read it again.  My full line was " It provides a very good escape from the hypothetical or philosophical 
games that people play that -----=====SPECULATE=======------ on both the "evil" and "good" uses of Tor."

The issue is the speculation on the uses, not what actually constitutes good or evil. There are no metrics out there used in these discussions.  The New Yorker's service, however, is a visible tangible service that doesn't require speculation.




----- Original Message -----
From: Juan Garofalo <juan.g71@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor's reputation problem with pedo,
 some easy  steps the community could take


>  It provides a very good escape from the hypothetical or philosophical games that people play that speculate on both the "evil" and "good" uses of Tor.  


        Philosophical games? You want to present Tor as 'good' and at the same time you scoff at  people asking what 'good' means?

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk