[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor limitation

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 04:14:53PM -0800, ADB wrote:
> Yeah. Go I2p and tor rendezvous! Seriously though, someone on EFF or 
> IETF's payroll has got to be willing and able to go over there and check 
> it out. If these orgs REALLY want to know what's going on over there and 
> help people, they need current, reliable information, right?
Isn't the EFF more geared toward defending digital rights in the US?
Sure, the slogan is "Defending Freedom in the Digital World," but most
of their activities are obviously US-centric. Things like the "How to
Blog Safely" (http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Anonymity/blog-anonymously.php)
document are "exportable" (at least for English readers), but I don't
believe they've gotten involved with foreign governments like they have
with the US government, right?

Anyway, for a bit of perspective on the "Chinese version of the
internet", so to speak, check out this post from EastSouthWestNorth:

Choice quote:
"Since people in China have never been free to express their political
views in public, not being able to do so in cyberspace isn't actually
viewed as a sacrifice. People don't feel like they're giving anything
up. On the contrary, they feel that blogs and other forms of online
social media have given them a great deal more freedom of expression
than they ever had before."

As for China exit nodes and Tor, it'd be fine to have middleman/entry
nodes as well as directory servers AFAICT. I'm hoping anyone in China
considering running a Tor server would recognize that people on the
network wouldn't appreciate exiting from a node in China...