On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Christian Siefkes wrote: > What would be the purpose of running Tor in a private single-owner network? Being able to buy a speedy, reliable service? (Besides, with peering it could be a private multi-owner network mosaic, only with guaranteed throughput). > The network owner knows who you are and what you do, so unless you know you > can trust them _and_ they won't surrender to legal or hacker attacks you're If there are no logs there is nothing to surrender. As to hackers, systems can be sufficiently hardened and monitored. > out of luck. > > You can just skip the Tor part and use a private SSH tunnel such as > Privacy.li, that'll give you the same amount of security. I don't know the people behind privacy.li. Are these the usual suspects? Static SSH tunnels are somewhat of a sitting duck, too. Tor is more dynamic. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature