Another possible way would be, to integrate the server hoster into your security considerations. What about telling the provider what you are going to do, which risks there are and how to handle abuse inquiries? This way of open (and fair) play could give you some advantages in serious situations later! They want you as customer, but only if they're able to evaluate the possible risks. This is understandable. But on this open play, i could imagine, they have the chance to succor your business and probable are able to explain to the officers, *before* they take your server off... If the node operators claim to be white hats, wouldn't that be a good way to obtain some serious understanding? Just a thought. Greets Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Ricky Fitz: > Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 10:15 -0400 schrieb Wilfred L. Guerin: > > > Your best option, in any case, is to test it! (maximal loss is 1 month > > service fee?) > > 3 months, but that's okay. Probably we should start a Wiki-Page with > experiences about different Hosting-Provider? > > Regards, > Ricky. -- BlueStar88 <BlueStar88@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil