[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?

To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
From: Lenard Lindstrom <len-l@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:35:36 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:35:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <5F2B121A-62B5-47EB-ABEB-3D81EDFEE79E@xxxxxxx>
References: <20081210222415.4D7ECCBBCF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5F2B121A-62B5-47EB-ABEB-3D81EDFEE79E@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Pygame already compiles and runs with Python 2.6. I've done this withWindows, but have no access to OS X. So Pygame for Python 2.6 isavailable to anyone who wants to build it. At least on a Unix systemtheir is no issues with C runtime compatibility.


Lenard

Bill Coderre wrote:

So Mac users do not need python 2.3 support. I'm more interested in2.6 or 3.0 support, in an idle, "Someday, the future will bring usflying cars" kind of way.



--
Lenard Lindstrom
<len-l@xxxxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: Brian Fisher

References:
- Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: yanom @linuxmail.org
- Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
  - From: Bill Coderre

Prev by Author: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Next by Author: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Previous by thread: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Next by thread: Re: [pygame] Do we still need Python 2.3 support from Pygame?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread