On, Tue Feb 10, 2009, Rene Dudfield wrote: > well, pyg_ seems like a good one :) > > Separate libraries seem better for modularity, and is more how they > are done currently. eg. So you don't need to use the scrap stuff if > you don't want. libpyg_scrap.so etc ? > We could split it that way. Or even make two different build tasks. One containing all parts in a single library, one creating multiple libraries, a separate one for each purpose. Regards Marcus
Attachment:
pgpN8SAbaOkd9.pgp
Description: PGP signature