Re: [tor-relays] Consensus weight dropped

[Network Operations Center <noc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What if one were to shut down the node for several days and then restart 
it. Wouldnt that maybe prompt the network to "rescan" the node?

On 31.01.2015 10:48 PM, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> at this point I want to thank Bram de Boer for spending an unmetered
> server. Dediacted servers with unmetered network is not cheap and 
> should
> be treated differently as a virtual server at OVH.
> I can totally agree why he is disappointed about that.
>
> Just deleting the identity is not a solution for me. The identity of a
> server is also a certificate of the spend effort. If something like 
> that
> would happen to my relays I would be out of here. Especially I'm not
> using Tor at all but want to help people who can not access the web 
> like
> I can do.
>
> I recently tried to check why the consensus dropped by reviewing the
> votes data and digged into the source but my knowledge about that is 
> far
> below the average. So I hope someone with more knowledge is reviewing
> this case and post a solution or declare it as a general probleme and
> write a bug report.
>
> ~Josef
>
> Am 31.01.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Network Operations Center:
> > 2)
> > This link has been posted:
> > http://freehaven.net/~arma/moria1-v3-status-votes
> > which is a collection of all 9 BWauth nodes. Currently there is
> > nothing a node operator can do bar deleting his keys. Atleast no other
> > solution has been posted in this thread.
> >
> > On 31.01.2015 10:23 PM, starlight.2015q1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > At 21:51 1/31/2015 +0100, you wrote:
> > > > This has already been done.
> > >
> > > Implicit in my post is that
> > >
> > > 1) about 10 days have passed, so recent
> > > data is more relevant than the earlier
> > > work, especially an one BWauth operator
> > > stated his node should be doing better;
> > > and
> > >
> > > 2) no precise mention of how to obtain
> > > the data was posted earlier and doing
> > > so might enable Bram de Boer to examine
> > > and track the situation directly.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tor-relays mailing list
> > > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> > _______________________________________________
> > tor-relays mailing list
> > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays