[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
From: kai-martin knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:27:32 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:27:56 -0400
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1082331927.11146981281106321368.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1281107965.2302.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1281135094.2584.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100807004214.GA12420@xxxxxx> <C339ECB5-1063-48CD-8DC8-63547E21BE76@xxxxxxxxx> <1281365063.2128.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B3B7ACF0-E788-44FD-880C-40674DEDCC00@xxxxxxxxx> <1281734591.2127.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1F377D52-84B9-4F9A-9EF9-A31AC9D35240@xxxxxxxxx> <201008132339.o7DNd3gm004135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9F119605-6E8E-418C-8FFF-0DB147CE666A@xxxxxxxxx> <1281744789.2127.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9E9504A6-9E4D-4600-B847-9796ED83C237@xxxxxxxxx> <i44pfi$2cq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EE040A74-3957-4055-837E-5576D7A99DD0@xxxxxxxxx> <i44q89$3qn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <83A13972-C091-4A86-AAE2-DE9D73F89826@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KNode/4.3.4

John Doty wrote:

>> Biology, astronomy, algebra, set theory and database theory all use the
>> concept of subclasses.
> 
> But I've worked in astronomy for decades without ever encountering the
> term "superclass". Nor are "classes" in astronomy associated with
> "methods".

read again: Did I write "superclass"?
Your statement was, that classes do not contain classes anywhere but in OO.
I gave five disjunct areas where classes can indeed contain classes.

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Andrew Poelstra
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: kai-martin knaak
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: kai-martin knaak
- Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
  - From: John Doty

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: wishful UI
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread