John Doty wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 4:51 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:No it is not. Even simple things like footprint names have a pretty rigid syntax to adhere to. The workflow breaks in cryptic ways if they are not obeyed.This is a pure "pcb" limitation, not a gEDA limitation in general.
Isn't a chain as strong as it's weakest link ? _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user