[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such
al davis wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2007, Steve Meier wrote:
>
> Steve also said this in private mail (I hope you don't mind my
> repeating it in public):
>> I actually think that one of the rather remarkable things
>> about geda is the use of a macro language to generate the
>> output.
> .... repeated because I agree with it, strongly.
>
> On Thursday 06 December 2007, John Doty wrote:
>> I have no strong preference as
>> long as the result retains gEDA's flexibility.
> ... also repeated because I agree with it, strongly.
>
> Those last two points are so strong that if the format fails to
> meet either, it must be rejected.
>
So, guile/scheme has macro capability enough, but isn't much like m4...
That's not a problem, is it?
John Griessen
--
Ecosensory
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user