[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Heavy Symbols and such



DJ Delorie wrote:
>> The phrase "doesn't scale" comes to mind.
> 
> For memory I manually re-route connections in gschem after figuring
> out what makes sense in pcb; then load the new netlist and let pcb
> complain about whatever needs moving to make it so.

My solution was to run through a bus, even where it wasn't needed for 
readability.  Then the pin swapping is easily accomplished using net 
names on the bus rippers.  For memories, this is actually a pretty good 
solution.

> In my examples, I've been using sub-slotting for my pin maps.  That
> syntax isn't properly parseable, but perhaps something like this would
> be...  Example 7410:
> 
>       ([1,2,13],12),([3,4,5],6),([9,10,11],8)

Yeah, I obviously didn't think through for the interaction between 
slots, pin swapping, and share power pins.

-dave


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user