Re: gEDA-user: overlapping via changes

[kai-martin knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephan Boettcher wrote:

> Rocket Scientist need to qualify everything that is even marginally
> unusual, over full temperature range, and mechanical loads, in 
> vacuum. That will cost a thick branch of some big tree (10kg
> paperwork).

Not all rockets are NASA operated :-)


> Rocket science is the last place where you'll find those holes, if
> they can be avoided in any way :-)

Coincidently, we do put some of our experiments in rockets. The 
subject is Bose-Einstein condensates under zero gravity conditions.
The rockets barely enter space and come down after a few minutes
of parabola flight. But still, they are rockets performing science.
Space and to a lesser extend, weight is at premium within these 
pay loads. So everything that needs less space is welcome, even 
overlapping holes. That said, we haven't designed in any of these
mutant holes, yet ;-)

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user