[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Who is evil?
> I would caution.
> That labeling of a company as evil just because they are offering use of
> proprietary tools, will probably turn off a lot of companies that you
> would like to sponsor geda.
> Show the corporate world that geda is more flexible, a strong supportive
> user base, support for simulation and integrates well with established
> tools. Don't expect to win the hearts and dollars of corporations on
> some sort of ethical argument that is counter intuitive to most us
> companies marketing.
Of course you are right. I was just trying to be jocular, which is
hard to convey in an e-mail format.
Also, I am aware that the open-source movement has some leading lights
who see the issue of "free software" in moral terms. I understand and
appreciate that point; as others have said, FOSS is the application of
the scientific method (based upon enlightenment principles) to the
development of software. One can understand this as partly a moral
However, I don't think that's the right way to try to sell the
open-source methodology to businesses. The right way is to emphasize
control ("who owns your design?") and (secondarily) cost.
geda-user mailing list