Re: gEDA-user: PCB Patches: Use c99 bool instead of manual typedef.

[Peter Clifton <pcjc2@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 13:19 +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
> Hiya,
> 
> On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 12:44 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Also - it would appear the changes unintentionally changed some quoted
> > strings (caught when attempting to rebase my branches). I'm prepared
> > to accept some bugs / mistakes, but really - we need to be CAREFUL
> > with mechanised changes like this.
> 
> Sorry about that.  I should have caught that one.
> 
> I investigated using a semantic patch, but I concluded that the tools
> aren't quite there yet for this.  (Hopefully one day the versioning tool
> will support semantic patches.)

Something which has the intelligence to understand the C code as its
patching? (IE.. reference the type directly as a particular type etc..)?

What (if any) kind of tools support that?

Best regards,

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user