Re: gEDA-user: gsch2pcb (gnetlist) generates corrupted pcb output

[Matthew Lai <cyberfish@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

That may be it! Will give it a try tonight.

I happen to be building a DSO, too, but mine is much simpler, with just 
a few chips (including an FPGA), and a few dozen passive components.

If the "stack" is the callstack, there could be a difference between 
32-bit and 64-bit. A stack frame would be about 2x as big on 64-bit 
(since addresses are 64-bit, and pushed registers are also 64-bit each), 
for functions that don't have many/big local variables.

If that's really the problem, maybe we should change the default? I 
thought most designs would be bigger than 41 capacitors.

Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 17:22 -0700, Matthew Lai wrote:
>   
> > Yeap, the 41 capacitors thing is my reduced test case that still shows 
> > this problem.
> >
> > Should be some kind of overflow, 
> >     
>
> My only idea:
>
> In my DAD/DSO project with about 1000 symbols/elements I have
>
> stefan@AMD64X2 ~ $ cat /mnt/data/stefan/gEDA/DAD/gafrc    
> (debug-options (list 'stack 200000))
> (component-library "../imported-symbols/")
> (component-library "../gedasymbols.org_salewski_symbols/")
> (component-library "../custom-symbols/")
> ;(component-library "local-symbols/")
>
>
> The entry 
>
> (debug-options (list 'stack 200000))
>
> was necessary for gnetlist, other people have reported the same on this
> list for larger projects.
>
> But your schematic worked without that for me.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>   



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user