Re: gEDA-user: What is the current procedure and location to submit patches for PCB?

[Bob Paddock <bob.paddock@xxxxxxxxx>]

...
> What I'm doing in ps.c:
>
> 1:
> Running Lint over the code trying to understand what is going on.
> Should I fix problems like local FILE *f; hiding global FILE *f?
> Why are things like x2=x2 in there, shall I remove them? Looks
> like something that at one time was a swap that has accumulated
> to much bit rot.
>
> 2:
> Add to table of contents "1. Table Of Contents (This Page)".
> Starting with "2. ..." just looks broken to me.
>
> 3:
> Add proper PostScript Document Structuring Conventions ( DSC )
> header, and fix %%Page  to have proper label and number.
> End result should be a Red Book compliant PostScript file,
> which Windows can properly digest.

...

If anyone wants to tryout those changes you can download
a new ps.c here:

http://www.designer-iii.com/gEDA/ps.c

> Do you want one new ps.c or incremental diffs?

Before I make a proper diff, is there any type of regression
test suite for PCB?  I'm not 100% sure that I covered all of the
usages cases.  The few that I did try Did The Right Thing.

GSView on Windows now reports zero errors and
warnings.  Page navigation also works correctly.  gv on Linux
is also happy as far as I can tell, it had no complains all along.








-- 
http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/
http://www.softwaresafety.net/
http://www.designer-iii.com/
http://www.unusualresearch.com/


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user