Re: gEDA-user: fritzing

["David C. Kerber" <dkerber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

One possibility would be to do something similar to what Cisco does with the GUI they have for their security appliances:  a gui that handles basic setup, and issues commands in their standard cli format to the appliance.  But the gui is optional, and if you want to use just the cli because that's what you're familiar with, or to do high level stuff that can't be done with the gui, that works fine as well.

D


> -----Original Message-----
> From: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of der Mouse
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:10 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: fritzing
> 
> > All the comments about Fritzing vs. gEDA are very true.  It would 
> > indeed be nice if gEDA (particularly the gschem -> PCB 
> flow) were more 
> > polished and newbie friendly.
> 
> Would it?
> 
> In many cases I've seen, making something newbie friendly 
> results in also making it expert crippling.  I have seen 
> exceptions, but it might be worth at least thinking about the danger.
> 
> /~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>  X  Against HTML		mouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> / \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
> 


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user