[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such



DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I'm not advocating making a relational database part of the required
>> geda tool set
> 
> No reason it couldn't be, either.  We can hide all that in gattrib and
> the netlisters.
> 
> No reason not to support multiple BOM files in gattrib either; just
> like we support multiple SCH files already.
>

Sounds like a really good partitioning of functions to me.

John G
-- 
Ecosensory


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user