[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: uEDA .. was .. Re: Heavy Symbols and such
DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I'm not advocating making a relational database part of the required
>> geda tool set
>
> No reason it couldn't be, either. We can hide all that in gattrib and
> the netlisters.
>
> No reason not to support multiple BOM files in gattrib either; just
> like we support multiple SCH files already.
>
Sounds like a really good partitioning of functions to me.
John G
--
Ecosensory
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user